enlightenment: be important for development

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents movement
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.58
Siblings romanticism
Weight: 0.56
, civilization
Weight: 0.34
, socialism
Weight: 0.33
, liberalism
Weight: 0.33
, immortality
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important for development 1.00
be important for development of sociology 0.81
be important to us 0.77
be important today 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(enlightenment, be important for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(romanticism, be important today)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(enlightenment, be important for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(socialism, be important today)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(enlightenment, be important for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(socialism, be important today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(socialism, be important today)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(enlightenment, be important for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(romanticism, be important today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(romanticism, be important today)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(enlightenment, be important for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(enlightenment, be important for development)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(enlightenment, be important for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(enlightenment, be important today)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(enlightenment, be important for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(enlightenment, be important for development of sociology)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(enlightenment, be important for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(enlightenment, be important today)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(enlightenment, be important for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(enlightenment, be important today)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(enlightenment, be important for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(enlightenment, be important to us)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(enlightenment, be important for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(enlightenment, be important for development of sociology)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(enlightenment, be important for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(enlightenment, be important for development of sociology)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(enlightenment, be important for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(enlightenment, be important for development of sociology)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(enlightenment, be important for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(enlightenment, be important today)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(enlightenment, be important for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(enlightenment, be important to us)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(enlightenment, be important for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(enlightenment, be important to us)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(enlightenment, be important for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(enlightenment, be important to us)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(enlightenment, be important for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(enlightenment, be important for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(enlightenment, be important for development)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(enlightenment, be important for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(enlightenment, be important for development)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(enlightenment, be important for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(socialism, be important today)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(enlightenment, be important for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(romanticism, be important today)