entry: improve resource allocation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents submission
Weight: 0.57
, writing
Weight: 0.56
, option
Weight: 0.55
, matter
Weight: 0.55
Siblings line item
Weight: 0.58
, stock option
Weight: 0.30
, exit
Weight: 0.30
, lock
Weight: 0.30
, incorporation
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
improve resource allocation 1.00
help improve 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(entry, improve resource allocation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(exit, help improve)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(entry, improve resource allocation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(exit, help improve) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(exit, help improve)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(entry, improve resource allocation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(entry, improve resource allocation)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(entry, improve resource allocation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(entry, help improve)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(entry, improve resource allocation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(entry, help improve)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(entry, improve resource allocation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(entry, help improve)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(entry, improve resource allocation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(entry, help improve)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(entry, improve resource allocation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(entry, improve resource allocation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(entry, improve resource allocation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(entry, improve resource allocation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(entry, improve resource allocation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(entry, improve resource allocation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(exit, help improve)