equalizer: have r rating

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.59
, device
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, feature
Weight: 0.56
Siblings header
Weight: 0.34
, goalie
Weight: 0.32
, victory
Weight: 0.31
, play game
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
have r rating 1.00
is two rated r 0.84
is 2 rated r 0.84
is 1 rated r 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(equalizer, have r rating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(equalizer, have r rating)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(equalizer, have r rating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(equalizer, is two rated r)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(equalizer, have r rating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(equalizer, is two rated r)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(equalizer, have r rating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(equalizer, is two rated r)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(equalizer, have r rating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(equalizer, is 2 rated r)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(equalizer, have r rating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(equalizer, is 2 rated r)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(equalizer, have r rating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(equalizer, is 2 rated r)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(equalizer, have r rating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(equalizer, is 1 rated r)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(equalizer, have r rating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(equalizer, is 1 rated r)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(equalizer, have r rating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(equalizer, is 1 rated r)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(equalizer, have r rating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(equalizer, is two rated r)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(equalizer, have r rating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(equalizer, is 2 rated r)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(equalizer, have r rating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(equalizer, is 1 rated r)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(equalizer, have r rating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(equalizer, have r rating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(equalizer, have r rating)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(equalizer, have r rating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(equalizer, have r rating)