equilibrium: has quality price

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents term
Weight: 0.57
, concept
Weight: 0.55
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, movie
Weight: 0.52
Siblings harmony
Weight: 0.32
, elasticity
Weight: 0.32
, singularity
Weight: 0.31
, cohesion
Weight: 0.31
, duality
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality price 1.00
is price level 0.92
has quality bad 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(equilibrium, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cohesion, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(equilibrium, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(cohesion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(cohesion, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(equilibrium, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(equilibrium, has quality price)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(equilibrium, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(equilibrium, is price level)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(equilibrium, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(equilibrium, is price level)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(equilibrium, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(equilibrium, is price level)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(equilibrium, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(equilibrium, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(equilibrium, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(equilibrium, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(equilibrium, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(equilibrium, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(equilibrium, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(equilibrium, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(equilibrium, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(equilibrium, is price level)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(equilibrium, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(equilibrium, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(equilibrium, has quality price)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(equilibrium, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(equilibrium, has quality price)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(equilibrium, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(cohesion, has quality bad)