eskimo: need polar bears

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents native american
Weight: 0.57
, language
Weight: 0.55
, term
Weight: 0.50
, culture
Weight: 0.48
, society
Weight: 0.46
Siblings inuit
Weight: 0.45
, italian language
Weight: 0.33
, english language
Weight: 0.33
, chinese language
Weight: 0.33
, old english
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
need polar bears 1.00
need bears 0.88
live in arctic 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(eskimo, need polar bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(inuit, live in arctic)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(eskimo, need polar bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(inuit, live in arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(inuit, live in arctic)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(eskimo, need polar bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(eskimo, need polar bears)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(eskimo, need polar bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(eskimo, need bears)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(eskimo, need polar bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(eskimo, need bears)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(eskimo, need polar bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(eskimo, live in arctic)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(eskimo, need polar bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(eskimo, live in arctic)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(eskimo, need polar bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(eskimo, live in arctic)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(eskimo, need polar bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(eskimo, live in arctic)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(eskimo, need polar bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(eskimo, need bears)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(eskimo, need polar bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(eskimo, need bears)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(eskimo, need polar bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(eskimo, need polar bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(eskimo, need polar bears)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(eskimo, need polar bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(eskimo, need polar bears)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(eskimo, need polar bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(inuit, live in arctic)