esophagus: has quality function

Related concepts

Parents	mucous membrane Weight: 0.66 , digestive system Weight: 0.60 , organ Weight: 0.57 , alimentary canal Weight: 0.55 , condition Weight: 0.55
Siblings	small intestine Weight: 0.36 , lung Weight: 0.35 , irritable bowel syndrome Weight: 0.35 , rectum Weight: 0.35 , intestine Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality function	1.00
be in function	0.92
has quality system	0.82
has quality good	0.78
has quality bad	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(digestive system, has quality system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(esophagus, has quality function)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(organ, be in function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(esophagus, has quality function)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(digestive system, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(esophagus, has quality function)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(esophagus, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(organ, be in function)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(esophagus, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(digestive system, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(esophagus, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(digestive system, has quality system)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(esophagus, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(digestive system, has quality bad)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(esophagus, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(digestive system, has quality system)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(esophagus, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(organ, be in function)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(esophagus, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(intestine, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(digestive system, has quality system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(esophagus, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(esophagus, has quality function)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(organ, be in function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(esophagus, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(esophagus, has quality function)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(digestive system, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(esophagus, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(esophagus, has quality function)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(esophagus, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(intestine, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(intestine, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(esophagus, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(esophagus, has quality function)

Similarity expansion

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.90

Typical(esophagus, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(esophagus, has quality good)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(esophagus, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Salient(esophagus, has quality good)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(esophagus, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(esophagus, has quality good)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(esophagus, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(esophagus, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(esophagus, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(esophagus, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(esophagus, has quality function)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(esophagus, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(esophagus, has quality function)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(esophagus, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(organ, be in function)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(esophagus, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(digestive system, has quality bad)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(esophagus, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(digestive system, has quality system)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(esophagus, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(intestine, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.90

Typical(esophagus, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(organ, be in function)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.90

Typical(esophagus, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(digestive system, has quality system)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.90

Typical(esophagus, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(digestive system, has quality bad)