esophagus: hurt

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mucous membrane
Weight: 0.66
, digestive system
Weight: 0.60
, organ
Weight: 0.57
, alimentary canal
Weight: 0.55
, condition
Weight: 0.55
Siblings small intestine
Weight: 0.36
, lung
Weight: 0.35
, irritable bowel syndrome
Weight: 0.35
, rectum
Weight: 0.35
, intestine
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
hurt 1.00
hurt running 0.89
hurt after smoking 0.81
hurt quitting 0.79
hurt with diarrhea 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(esophagus, hurt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(intestine, hurt)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(esophagus, hurt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(lung, hurt)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(esophagus, hurt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(intestine, hurt with diarrhea)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(esophagus, hurt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(lung, hurt after smoking)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(esophagus, hurt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(lung, hurt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(lung, hurt)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(esophagus, hurt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(intestine, hurt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(intestine, hurt)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(esophagus, hurt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(lung, hurt after smoking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(lung, hurt after smoking)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(esophagus, hurt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(intestine, hurt with diarrhea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(intestine, hurt with diarrhea)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(esophagus, hurt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(esophagus, hurt)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(esophagus, hurt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(esophagus, hurt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(esophagus, hurt)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(esophagus, hurt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(esophagus, hurt)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(esophagus, hurt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(intestine, hurt)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(esophagus, hurt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(lung, hurt)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(esophagus, hurt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(intestine, hurt with diarrhea)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(esophagus, hurt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(lung, hurt after smoking)