esophagus: is significant

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mucous membrane
Weight: 0.66
, digestive system
Weight: 0.60
, organ
Weight: 0.57
, alimentary canal
Weight: 0.55
, condition
Weight: 0.55
Siblings small intestine
Weight: 0.36
, lung
Weight: 0.35
, irritable bowel syndrome
Weight: 0.35
, rectum
Weight: 0.35
, intestine
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is significant 1.00
is big 0.77
be important in servicescapes 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(condition, be important in servicescapes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(esophagus, is significant)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(esophagus, is significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(condition, be important in servicescapes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(esophagus, is significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(condition, be important in servicescapes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(esophagus, is significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(lung, is big)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(condition, be important in servicescapes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(esophagus, is significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(esophagus, is significant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(esophagus, is significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(lung, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(lung, is big)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(esophagus, is significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(esophagus, is significant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(esophagus, is significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(esophagus, is significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(esophagus, is significant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(esophagus, is significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(esophagus, is significant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(esophagus, is significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(condition, be important in servicescapes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(esophagus, is significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lung, is big)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(esophagus, is significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(condition, be important in servicescapes)