estate: be in denmark

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents real estate
Weight: 0.82
, document
Weight: 0.58
, matter
Weight: 0.58
, property
Weight: 0.58
Siblings farm
Weight: 0.64
, widow
Weight: 0.59
, plantation
Weight: 0.53
, manor
Weight: 0.49
, real estate agent
Weight: 0.42

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in denmark 1.00
be expensive in canada 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(real estate, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(estate, be in denmark)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(real estate, be in denmark)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(estate, be in denmark)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(estate, be in denmark)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(real estate, be in denmark)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(estate, be in denmark)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(real estate, be expensive in canada)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(estate, be in denmark)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(real estate, be in denmark)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(estate, be in denmark)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(real estate, be expensive in canada)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(real estate, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(estate, be in denmark)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(estate, be in denmark)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(real estate, be in denmark)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(estate, be in denmark)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(estate, be in denmark)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(estate, be in denmark)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(estate, be in denmark)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(estate, be in denmark)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(estate, be expensive in canada)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(estate, be in denmark)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(estate, be expensive in canada)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(estate, be in denmark)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(estate, be expensive in canada)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(estate, be in denmark)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(estate, be expensive in canada)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(estate, be in denmark)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(estate, be in denmark)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(estate, be in denmark)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(estate, be in denmark)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(estate, be in denmark)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(estate, be in denmark)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(real estate, be in denmark)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(estate, be in denmark)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in canada)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(estate, be in denmark)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(real estate, be in denmark)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(estate, be in denmark)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in canada)