estimate: be critical to effective project

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents projection
Weight: 0.63
, report
Weight: 0.61
, word
Weight: 0.59
, term
Weight: 0.58
Siblings figure
Weight: 0.64
, assumption
Weight: 0.63
, cost
Weight: 0.63
, comparison
Weight: 0.60
, median
Weight: 0.52

Related properties

Property Similarity
be critical to effective project 1.00
be critical to effective project management 0.96
be critical to project 0.94
be critical to project management 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(estimate, be critical to effective project)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(estimate, be critical to effective project)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(estimate, be critical to effective project)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(estimate, be critical to effective project management)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(estimate, be critical to effective project)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(estimate, be critical to effective project management)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(estimate, be critical to effective project)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(estimate, be critical to project)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(estimate, be critical to effective project)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(estimate, be critical to project)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(estimate, be critical to effective project)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(estimate, be critical to effective project management)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(estimate, be critical to effective project)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(estimate, be critical to project)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(estimate, be critical to effective project)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(estimate, be critical to project management)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(estimate, be critical to effective project)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(estimate, be critical to project management)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(estimate, be critical to effective project)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(estimate, be critical to project management)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(estimate, be critical to effective project)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(estimate, be critical to effective project management)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(estimate, be critical to effective project)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(estimate, be critical to project management)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(estimate, be critical to effective project)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(estimate, be critical to project)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(estimate, be critical to effective project)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(estimate, be critical to effective project)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(estimate, be critical to effective project)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(estimate, be critical to effective project)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(estimate, be critical to effective project)