estuary: be ideal habitats for animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ecosystem
Weight: 0.66
, area
Weight: 0.63
, place
Weight: 0.60
, wetland
Weight: 0.58
, shallow water
Weight: 0.54
Siblings chesapeake bay
Weight: 0.72
, bay
Weight: 0.66
, shoreline
Weight: 0.36
, marsh
Weight: 0.36
, coral reef
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be ideal habitats for animals 1.00
be important habitats for organisms 0.90
be important habitats for many organisms 0.90
be such rich habitats for organisms 0.89
be rich habitat for things 0.85
be rich habitat for living things 0.84
be important for wildlife 0.83
be more fertile than aquatic ecosystems 0.83
be more fertile than other aquatic ecosystems 0.83
is important ecosystems 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(estuary, be ideal habitats for animals)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(estuary, be ideal habitats for animals)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(estuary, be ideal habitats for animals)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(estuary, be important habitats for organisms)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(estuary, be ideal habitats for animals)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(estuary, be important habitats for many organisms)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(estuary, be ideal habitats for animals)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(estuary, be such rich habitats for organisms)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(estuary, be ideal habitats for animals)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(estuary, be important habitats for organisms)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(estuary, be ideal habitats for animals)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(estuary, be such rich habitats for organisms)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(estuary, be ideal habitats for animals)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(estuary, be important habitats for organisms)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(estuary, be ideal habitats for animals)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(estuary, be important habitats for many organisms)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(estuary, be ideal habitats for animals)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(estuary, be such rich habitats for organisms)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(estuary, be ideal habitats for animals)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(estuary, be important habitats for many organisms)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(estuary, be ideal habitats for animals)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(estuary, be rich habitat for living things)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(estuary, be ideal habitats for animals)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(estuary, be more fertile than aquatic ecosystems)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(estuary, be ideal habitats for animals)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(estuary, be important for wildlife)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(estuary, be ideal habitats for animals)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(estuary, be more fertile than other aquatic ecosystems)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(estuary, be ideal habitats for animals)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(estuary, be rich habitat for living things)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(estuary, be ideal habitats for animals)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(estuary, be more fertile than aquatic ecosystems)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(estuary, be ideal habitats for animals)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(estuary, be rich habitat for living things)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(estuary, be ideal habitats for animals)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(estuary, be more fertile than other aquatic ecosystems)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(estuary, be ideal habitats for animals)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(estuary, be more fertile than aquatic ecosystems)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(estuary, be ideal habitats for animals)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(estuary, be important for wildlife)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(estuary, be ideal habitats for animals)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(estuary, be more fertile than other aquatic ecosystems)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(estuary, be ideal habitats for animals)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(estuary, be important for wildlife)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(estuary, be ideal habitats for animals)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be important habitats for many organisms)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(estuary, be ideal habitats for animals)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be important habitats for organisms)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(estuary, be ideal habitats for animals)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be such rich habitats for organisms)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(estuary, be ideal habitats for animals)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be important for wildlife)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(estuary, be ideal habitats for animals)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be rich habitat for living things)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(estuary, be ideal habitats for animals)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be more fertile than other aquatic ecosystems)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(estuary, be ideal habitats for animals)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be more fertile than aquatic ecosystems)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(estuary, be ideal habitats for animals)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(estuary, be ideal habitats for animals)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be ideal habitats for animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(estuary, be ideal habitats for animals)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(estuary, be ideal habitats for animals)