estuary: be important to shellfish

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ecosystem
Weight: 0.66
, area
Weight: 0.63
, place
Weight: 0.60
, wetland
Weight: 0.58
, shallow water
Weight: 0.54
Siblings chesapeake bay
Weight: 0.72
, bay
Weight: 0.66
, shoreline
Weight: 0.36
, marsh
Weight: 0.36
, coral reef
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to shellfish 1.00
be important to fish 0.84
make fish nurseries 0.79
make great fish nurseries 0.78
be such as estuary 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be important to shellfish)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(coral reef, be important to fish)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(estuary, be important to shellfish)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(coral reef, be important to fish)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(coral reef, be important to fish)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(estuary, be important to shellfish)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(estuary, be important to shellfish)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(estuary, be important to shellfish)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(estuary, be important to fish)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(estuary, be important to shellfish)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(estuary, be important to fish)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(estuary, be important to shellfish)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(estuary, be important to fish)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(estuary, be important to shellfish)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(estuary, make great fish nurseries)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(estuary, be important to shellfish)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(estuary, make great fish nurseries)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(estuary, be important to shellfish)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(estuary, make great fish nurseries)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(estuary, be important to shellfish)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(estuary, make great fish nurseries)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(estuary, be important to shellfish)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be important to fish)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(estuary, be important to shellfish)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(estuary, be important to shellfish)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be important to shellfish)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(estuary, be important to shellfish)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(estuary, be important to shellfish)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be important to shellfish)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(coral reef, be important to fish)