etching: has physical part teeth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.61
, art
Weight: 0.60
, treatment
Weight: 0.57
, process
Weight: 0.56
, apparatus
Weight: 0.54
Siblings engraving
Weight: 0.34
, painting
Weight: 0.34
, calligraphy
Weight: 0.34
, carving
Weight: 0.33
, lamination
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part teeth 1.00
is teeth longer 0.88
is deciduous teeth longer 0.77
is deciduous teeth 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(etching, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(etching, has physical part teeth)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(etching, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(etching, is teeth longer)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(etching, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(etching, is deciduous teeth longer)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(etching, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(etching, is deciduous teeth)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(etching, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(etching, is teeth longer)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(etching, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(etching, is teeth longer)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(etching, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(etching, is deciduous teeth)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(etching, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(etching, is deciduous teeth longer)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(etching, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(etching, is teeth longer)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(etching, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(etching, is deciduous teeth)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(etching, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(etching, is deciduous teeth longer)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(etching, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(etching, is deciduous teeth)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(etching, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(etching, is deciduous teeth longer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(etching, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(etching, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(etching, has physical part teeth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(etching, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(etching, has physical part teeth)