eth: be stable compared to bitcoin

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.31
, theory
Weight: 0.26
Siblings cpu
Weight: 0.26
, o
Weight: 0.25
, parameter
Weight: 0.25
, pc
Weight: 0.25
, ra
Weight: 0.25

Related properties

Property Similarity
be stable compared to bitcoin 1.00
be compared to next-gen 0.88
become stable 0.86
be with comparable power 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(eth, be stable compared to bitcoin)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(o, become stable)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(eth, be stable compared to bitcoin)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pc, be compared to next-gen)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(eth, be stable compared to bitcoin)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(pc, be with comparable power)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(eth, be stable compared to bitcoin)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(pc, be compared to next-gen)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(pc, be compared to next-gen)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(eth, be stable compared to bitcoin)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(o, become stable)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(o, become stable)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(eth, be stable compared to bitcoin)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(pc, be with comparable power)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(pc, be with comparable power)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(eth, be stable compared to bitcoin)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(eth, be stable compared to bitcoin)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(eth, be stable compared to bitcoin)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(eth, be stable compared to bitcoin)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(eth, be stable compared to bitcoin)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(eth, be stable compared to bitcoin)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(eth, be stable compared to bitcoin)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(eth, be stable compared to bitcoin)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(o, become stable)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(eth, be stable compared to bitcoin)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(pc, be with comparable power)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(eth, be stable compared to bitcoin)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(pc, be compared to next-gen)