ethics: be important to person

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.57
, journal
Weight: 0.57
, course
Weight: 0.54
, committee
Weight: 0.53
, book
Weight: 0.50
Siblings commission
Weight: 0.32
, theology
Weight: 0.32
, science fiction
Weight: 0.32
, political ideology
Weight: 0.31
, senate
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to person 1.00
vary from person to person 0.87
be important element in house 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(committee, be important element in house) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(ethics, be important to person)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(ethics, be important to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(committee, be important element in house)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(ethics, be important to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(committee, be important element in house)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(committee, be important element in house) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(ethics, be important to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(ethics, be important to person)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(ethics, be important to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(ethics, be important to person)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(ethics, be important to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(ethics, vary from person to person)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(ethics, be important to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(ethics, vary from person to person)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(ethics, be important to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(ethics, vary from person to person)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(ethics, be important to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(ethics, vary from person to person)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(ethics, be important to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(ethics, be important to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(ethics, be important to person)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(ethics, be important to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(ethics, be important to person)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(ethics, be important to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(committee, be important element in house)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(ethics, be important to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(committee, be important element in house)