ethics: be related

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.57
, journal
Weight: 0.57
, course
Weight: 0.54
, committee
Weight: 0.53
, book
Weight: 0.50
Siblings commission
Weight: 0.32
, theology
Weight: 0.32
, science fiction
Weight: 0.32
, political ideology
Weight: 0.31
, senate
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related 1.00
relate to legal systems 0.76
be related to economics 0.76
was linked during ages 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(ethics, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(theology, was linked during ages)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ethics, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(theology, was linked during ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(theology, was linked during ages)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ethics, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(ethics, be related)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(ethics, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(ethics, relate to legal systems)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(ethics, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(ethics, relate to legal systems)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ethics, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(ethics, relate to legal systems)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(ethics, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(ethics, be related to economics)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(ethics, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(ethics, be related to economics)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(ethics, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ethics, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(ethics, be related)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ethics, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ethics, be related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(ethics, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(theology, was linked during ages)