ethics: is business concept

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.57
, journal
Weight: 0.57
, course
Weight: 0.54
, committee
Weight: 0.53
, book
Weight: 0.50
Siblings commission
Weight: 0.32
, theology
Weight: 0.32
, science fiction
Weight: 0.32
, political ideology
Weight: 0.31
, senate
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is business concept 1.00
is fundamental business concept 0.91
be in business 0.82
be important to business 0.80
be important in business 0.80
be important for business 0.80
matter in business 0.78
be good for business 0.78
be part of philosophy 0.77
is philosophy 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(ethics, is business concept)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(commission, be important in business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(ethics, is business concept)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(commission, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(commission, be important in business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(ethics, is business concept)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(ethics, is business concept)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(ethics, is business concept)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ethics, is fundamental business concept)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(ethics, is business concept)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(ethics, be in business)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(ethics, is business concept)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(ethics, is fundamental business concept)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(ethics, is business concept)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(ethics, is philosophy)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(ethics, is business concept)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(ethics, be important to business)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(ethics, is business concept)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(ethics, be in business)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(ethics, is business concept)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(ethics, be good for business)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(ethics, is business concept)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(ethics, be important to business)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(ethics, is business concept)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(ethics, be important in business)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(ethics, is business concept)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(ethics, be in business)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(ethics, is business concept)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(ethics, is fundamental business concept)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(ethics, is business concept)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(ethics, be in business)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(ethics, is business concept)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ethics, be part of philosophy)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(ethics, is business concept)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(ethics, be important in business)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(ethics, is business concept)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(ethics, is fundamental business concept)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(ethics, is business concept)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(ethics, is philosophy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(ethics, is business concept)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(ethics, is philosophy)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(ethics, is business concept)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(ethics, be important to business)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(ethics, is business concept)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(ethics, is philosophy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(ethics, is business concept)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(ethics, be important in business)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(ethics, is business concept)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(ethics, be important to business)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(ethics, is business concept)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(ethics, be part of philosophy)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(ethics, is business concept)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(ethics, be good for business)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(ethics, is business concept)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(ethics, be important in business)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(ethics, is business concept)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(ethics, be part of philosophy)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(ethics, is business concept)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(ethics, be part of philosophy)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(ethics, is business concept)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(ethics, be good for business)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(ethics, is business concept)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(ethics, be good for business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(ethics, is business concept)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(ethics, is business concept)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(ethics, is business concept)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(ethics, is business concept)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(ethics, is business concept)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(ethics, is business concept)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(commission, be important in business)