europe: be more developed than asia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents south america
Weight: 0.69
, south korea
Weight: 0.69
, north america
Weight: 0.68
, america
Weight: 0.67
, japan
Weight: 0.65
Siblings new zealand
Weight: 0.69
, italy
Weight: 0.68
, germany
Weight: 0.68
, spain
Weight: 0.68
, ireland
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more developed than asia 1.00
be than asia 0.94
be small compared to asia 0.88
be better than africa 0.81
be better than america 0.80
be much better than america 0.79
be wealthier than europe 0.79
be wealthier than eastern europe 0.78
be better than usa 0.78
was in 1900s different from europe of 1300s 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(north america, be better than america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(europe, be more developed than asia)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(europe, be more developed than asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(north america, be better than america)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(europe, be more developed than asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(north america, be better than america)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(north america, be better than america) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(europe, be more developed than asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(europe, be more developed than asia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(europe, be more developed than asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(europe, be more developed than asia)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(europe, be more developed than asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(europe, be much better than america)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(europe, be more developed than asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(europe, be much better than america)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(europe, be more developed than asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(europe, be much better than america)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(europe, be more developed than asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(europe, be much better than america)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(europe, be more developed than asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(europe, be more developed than asia) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(europe, be more developed than asia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(europe, be more developed than asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(europe, be more developed than asia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(europe, be more developed than asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(north america, be better than america)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(europe, be more developed than asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(north america, be better than america)