european: were insterested in africa

Property	Similarity
were insterested in africa	1.00
were interested in africa	0.90
trade with africa	0.88
were much more successful establishing in americas in africa	0.84
were much more successful establishing in americas then in africa	0.84
were intrested in asia	0.80
go asia	0.79
were interested in kenya	0.78
were interested in latin america	0.77
were first attracted america	0.77

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(european, were insterested in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(european, trade with africa)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(european, were insterested in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(european, were intrested in asia)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(european, were insterested in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(european, were interested in africa)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(european, were insterested in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Remarkable(european, were interested in kenya)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(european, were insterested in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(european, trade with africa)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.22

Salient(european, were insterested in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Salient(european, were interested in latin america)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(european, were insterested in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(european, were interested in latin america)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.22

Salient(european, were insterested in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Salient(european, were interested in kenya)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(european, were insterested in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(european, were interested in latin america)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(european, were insterested in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(european, were interested in africa)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(european, were insterested in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(european, were interested in latin america)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(european, were insterested in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(european, were intrested in asia)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.22

Salient(european, were insterested in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Salient(european, trade with africa)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(european, were insterested in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(european, were much more successful establishing in americas then in africa)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(european, were insterested in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(european, were interested in kenya)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.22

Salient(european, were insterested in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Salient(european, were interested in africa)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(european, were insterested in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(european, were interested in africa)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.22

Salient(european, were insterested in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Salient(european, were intrested in asia)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(european, were insterested in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(european, trade with africa)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(european, were insterested in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(european, were intrested in asia)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(european, were insterested in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(european, were much more successful establishing in americas then in africa)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(european, were insterested in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(european, were interested in kenya)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(european, were insterested in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(european, were much more successful establishing in americas then in africa)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.22

Salient(european, were insterested in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Salient(european, were much more successful establishing in americas then in africa)

Parents	race Weight: 0.55 , language Weight: 0.54 , christian Weight: 0.52 , word Weight: 0.51 , african Weight: 0.49
Siblings	portuguese Weight: 0.64 , irish Weight: 0.63 , british Weight: 0.54 , hungarian Weight: 0.51

european: were insterested in africa

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible