euthanasia: is immoral

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents practice
Weight: 0.60
, evil
Weight: 0.60
, action
Weight: 0.59
, law
Weight: 0.57
, issue
Weight: 0.57
Siblings overpopulation
Weight: 0.33
, nazism
Weight: 0.32
, torture
Weight: 0.32
, masturbation
Weight: 0.32
, cloning
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is immoral 1.00
is unethical 0.84
is morally wrong 0.82
is morally permissible 0.80
is morally right 0.79
is haram 0.75
is unconstitutional 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, is immoral) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(masturbation, is haram)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, is immoral) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(torture, is immoral)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, is immoral) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(torture, is unconstitutional)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(euthanasia, is immoral) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(torture, is immoral) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(torture, is immoral)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(euthanasia, is immoral) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(torture, is unconstitutional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(torture, is unconstitutional)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(euthanasia, is immoral) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(masturbation, is haram) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(masturbation, is haram)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(euthanasia, is immoral) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(euthanasia, is immoral)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(euthanasia, is immoral) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, is morally wrong)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(euthanasia, is immoral) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, is morally right)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(euthanasia, is immoral) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(euthanasia, is morally wrong)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(euthanasia, is immoral) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, is morally permissible)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(euthanasia, is immoral) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(euthanasia, is morally right)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(euthanasia, is immoral) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(euthanasia, is morally wrong)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(euthanasia, is immoral) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(euthanasia, is morally permissible)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(euthanasia, is immoral) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(euthanasia, is morally right)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(euthanasia, is immoral) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(euthanasia, is morally permissible)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(euthanasia, is immoral) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(euthanasia, is morally permissible)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(euthanasia, is immoral) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(euthanasia, is morally wrong)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(euthanasia, is immoral) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(euthanasia, is morally right)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(euthanasia, is immoral) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(euthanasia, is immoral) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, is immoral)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(euthanasia, is immoral) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(euthanasia, is immoral)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, is immoral) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(torture, is immoral)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, is immoral) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(torture, is unconstitutional)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, is immoral) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(masturbation, is haram)