evaluation: research

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents consideration
Weight: 0.66
, activity
Weight: 0.61
, document
Weight: 0.61
, discipline
Weight: 0.58
, recommendation
Weight: 0.57
Siblings appraisal
Weight: 0.60
, observation
Weight: 0.33
, documentation
Weight: 0.32
, business activity
Weight: 0.32
, orientation
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
research 1.00
be in research study 0.95
be important in research 0.95
be needed in research 0.91
be necessary in research 0.90
is research method 0.85
is good research method 0.84
be important technique in research 0.82
be important in subjects research 0.81
be important in human subjects research 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(consideration, be important in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(evaluation, research)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(recommendation, be important in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(evaluation, research)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(recommendation, be in research study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(evaluation, research)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(consideration, be important in subjects research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(evaluation, research)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(consideration, be important in human subjects research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(evaluation, research)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(evaluation, research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(recommendation, be in research study)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(evaluation, research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(recommendation, be important in research)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(evaluation, research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(consideration, be important in research)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(evaluation, research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(consideration, be important in subjects research)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(evaluation, research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(consideration, be important in human subjects research)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(recommendation, be in research study)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(consideration, be important in research)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(consideration, be important in human subjects research)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(recommendation, be important in research)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(consideration, be important in subjects research)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(observation, is good research method)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(observation, be needed in research)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(documentation, be necessary in research)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(recommendation, be in research study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(evaluation, research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(evaluation, research)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(consideration, be important in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(evaluation, research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(evaluation, research)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(recommendation, be important in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(evaluation, research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(evaluation, research)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(consideration, be important in subjects research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(evaluation, research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(evaluation, research)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(consideration, be important in human subjects research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(evaluation, research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(evaluation, research)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(evaluation, research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(documentation, be necessary in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(documentation, be necessary in research)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(evaluation, research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(observation, be needed in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(observation, be needed in research)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(evaluation, research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(observation, is good research method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(observation, is good research method)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(evaluation, research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(evaluation, research)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(evaluation, research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(evaluation, research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, research)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(evaluation, research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(evaluation, research)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(recommendation, be in research study)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(recommendation, be important in research)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(consideration, be important in research)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(consideration, be important in subjects research)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(consideration, be important in human subjects research)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(documentation, be necessary in research)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(observation, be needed in research)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(observation, is good research method)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(evaluation, research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(recommendation, be in research study)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(evaluation, research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(recommendation, be important in research)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(evaluation, research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(consideration, be important in research)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(evaluation, research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(consideration, be important in subjects research)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(evaluation, research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(consideration, be important in human subjects research)