everything: be more expensive in canada

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.64
, situation
Weight: 0.64
, trick
Weight: 0.63
, approach
Weight: 0.61
Siblings stuff
Weight: 0.59
, whole
Weight: 0.57
, pure water
Weight: 0.56
, hot weather
Weight: 0.55

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive in canada 1.00
be in canada cost more 0.95
cost more in canada 0.95
cost in more canada 0.95
cost in canada 0.93
be in canada 0.93
be more expensive in australia 0.92
be in canada worse 0.91
be much more expensive in australia 0.91
be in australia expensive 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(everything, be more expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(stuff, be more expensive in canada)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(everything, be more expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(stuff, be in canada)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(everything, be more expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(stuff, be more expensive in australia)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(everything, be more expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(stuff, be more expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(stuff, be more expensive in canada)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(everything, be more expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(stuff, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(stuff, be in canada)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(everything, be more expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(stuff, be more expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(stuff, be more expensive in australia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(everything, be more expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(everything, be more expensive in canada)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(everything, be more expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(everything, be more expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(everything, be more expensive in canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(everything, be more expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(everything, be more expensive in canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(everything, be more expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(stuff, be in canada)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(everything, be more expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(stuff, be more expensive in canada)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(everything, be more expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(stuff, be more expensive in australia)