evidence: be stronger than steel evidence

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents justification
Weight: 0.67
, material
Weight: 0.66
, confession
Weight: 0.65
, documentation
Weight: 0.64
Siblings report
Weight: 0.66
, doubt
Weight: 0.65
, testimony
Weight: 0.64
, transcript
Weight: 0.64
, fingerprint
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be stronger than steel evidence 1.00
is good evidence 0.82
is evidence 0.80
be considered evidence 0.79
is individual evidence 0.77
be considered individual evidence 0.77
be such useful piece of evidence 0.76
be improved by technology more durable than original 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(material, be improved by technology more durable than original)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(evidence, be stronger than steel evidence)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(evidence, be stronger than steel evidence)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(material, be improved by technology more durable than original)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(evidence, be stronger than steel evidence)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(material, be improved by technology more durable than original)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(evidence, be stronger than steel evidence)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(fingerprint, be considered individual evidence)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(evidence, be stronger than steel evidence)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(fingerprint, is good evidence)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(evidence, be stronger than steel evidence)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(fingerprint, is individual evidence)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(material, be improved by technology more durable than original)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(evidence, be stronger than steel evidence)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(evidence, be stronger than steel evidence)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(evidence, be stronger than steel evidence)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(fingerprint, is good evidence)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(fingerprint, is good evidence)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(evidence, be stronger than steel evidence)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(fingerprint, is individual evidence)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(fingerprint, is individual evidence)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(evidence, be stronger than steel evidence)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(fingerprint, be considered individual evidence)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(fingerprint, be considered individual evidence)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(evidence, be stronger than steel evidence)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(evidence, be stronger than steel evidence)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(evidence, be stronger than steel evidence)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(evidence, be stronger than steel evidence)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(evidence, be stronger than steel evidence)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(evidence, be stronger than steel evidence)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(evidence, be stronger than steel evidence)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(evidence, be stronger than steel evidence)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(material, be improved by technology more durable than original)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(evidence, be stronger than steel evidence)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(fingerprint, be considered individual evidence)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(evidence, be stronger than steel evidence)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(fingerprint, is individual evidence)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(evidence, be stronger than steel evidence)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(fingerprint, is good evidence)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(evidence, be stronger than steel evidence)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(material, be improved by technology more durable than original)