evil: be within hard

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.61
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, theme
Weight: 0.58
, movie
Weight: 0.58
, symbol
Weight: 0.57
Siblings corruption
Weight: 0.64
, masturbation
Weight: 0.63
, segregation
Weight: 0.61
, pedophilia
Weight: 0.60
, inequality
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
be within hard 1.00
be within 2 hard 0.95
is hard 0.85
is 5 hard 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(concept, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(evil, be within hard)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(evil, be within hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(concept, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(evil, be within hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(concept, is hard)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(concept, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(evil, be within hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(evil, be within hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(evil, be within hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(evil, be within hard)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(evil, be within hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(evil, be within 2 hard)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(evil, be within hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(evil, be within 2 hard)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(evil, be within hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(evil, be within 2 hard)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(evil, be within hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(evil, be within 2 hard)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(evil, be within hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(evil, is hard)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(evil, be within hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(evil, is hard)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(evil, be within hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(evil, is hard)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(evil, be within hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(evil, is hard)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(evil, be within hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(evil, be within hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(evil, be within hard)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(evil, be within hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(evil, be within hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(evil, be within hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(concept, is hard)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(evil, be within hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(concept, is hard)