evolution: be important to scientists

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.65
, process
Weight: 0.64
, change
Weight: 0.63
, belief
Weight: 0.62
, journal
Weight: 0.61
Siblings transformation
Weight: 0.35
, speciation
Weight: 0.34
, convergence
Weight: 0.34
, singularity
Weight: 0.33
, theory
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to scientists 1.00
help scientists 0.96
be important to science 0.80
be important in biology 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(evolution, be important to scientists)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important to science)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(evolution, be important to scientists)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(transformation, be important in biology)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(evolution, be important to scientists)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(theory, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(theory, be important to science)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(evolution, be important to scientists)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(transformation, be important in biology)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(transformation, be important in biology)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(evolution, be important to scientists)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(evolution, be important to scientists)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(evolution, be important to scientists)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(evolution, help scientists)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(evolution, be important to scientists)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(evolution, help scientists)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(evolution, be important to scientists)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(evolution, help scientists)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(evolution, be important to scientists)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(evolution, be important to science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(evolution, be important to scientists)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(evolution, be important to science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(evolution, be important to scientists)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(evolution, help scientists)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(evolution, be important to scientists)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(evolution, be important to science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(evolution, be important to scientists)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(evolution, be important in biology)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(evolution, be important to scientists)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(evolution, be important in biology)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(evolution, be important to scientists)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(evolution, be important in biology)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(evolution, be important to scientists)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(evolution, be important to science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(evolution, be important to scientists)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(evolution, be important in biology)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(evolution, be important to scientists)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(evolution, be important to scientists)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(evolution, be important to scientists)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(evolution, be important to scientists)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(evolution, be important to scientists)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(evolution, be important to scientists)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(transformation, be important in biology)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(evolution, be important to scientists)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(theory, be important to science)