exam: limit access to technologies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents assignment
Weight: 0.61
, challenge
Weight: 0.59
, event
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.57
Siblings midterm
Weight: 0.47
, stress test
Weight: 0.33
, algebra
Weight: 0.32
, course
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
limit access to technologies 1.00
limit access 0.89
have time limits 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(exam, limit access to technologies)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(exam, limit access to technologies)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(exam, limit access to technologies)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(exam, limit access)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(exam, limit access to technologies)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(exam, limit access)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(exam, limit access to technologies)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(exam, limit access)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(exam, limit access to technologies)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(exam, limit access)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(exam, limit access to technologies)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(exam, have time limits)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(exam, limit access to technologies)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(exam, have time limits)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(exam, limit access to technologies)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(exam, have time limits)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(exam, limit access to technologies)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(exam, have time limits)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(exam, limit access to technologies)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(exam, limit access to technologies)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(exam, limit access to technologies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(exam, limit access to technologies)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(exam, limit access to technologies)