example: be used to explain something

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents illustration
Weight: 0.74
, experiment
Weight: 0.68
, reason
Weight: 0.66
, act
Weight: 0.65
Siblings model
Weight: 0.65
, opportunity
Weight: 0.64
, piece
Weight: 0.62
, wise man
Weight: 0.62
, vision
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to explain something 1.00
be one part of something 0.78
be same as pretend 0.77
be defined as same as pretend 0.77
be confuse for real thing 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(act, be defined as same as pretend)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(example, be used to explain something)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(act, be same as pretend)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(example, be used to explain something)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(example, be used to explain something)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(act, be same as pretend)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(example, be used to explain something)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(act, be defined as same as pretend)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(example, be used to explain something)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(act, be same as pretend)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(example, be used to explain something)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(act, be defined as same as pretend)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(example, be used to explain something)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(model, be confuse for real thing)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(example, be used to explain something)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(piece, be one part of something)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(act, be defined as same as pretend)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(example, be used to explain something)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(example, be used to explain something)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(act, be same as pretend)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(example, be used to explain something)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(example, be used to explain something)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(example, be used to explain something)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(model, be confuse for real thing)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(model, be confuse for real thing)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(example, be used to explain something)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(piece, be one part of something)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(piece, be one part of something)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(example, be used to explain something)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(example, be used to explain something)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(example, be used to explain something)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(example, be used to explain something)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(example, be used to explain something)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(example, be used to explain something)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(example, be used to explain something)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(example, be used to explain something)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(act, be defined as same as pretend)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(example, be used to explain something)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(act, be same as pretend)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(example, be used to explain something)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(piece, be one part of something)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(example, be used to explain something)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(model, be confuse for real thing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(example, be used to explain something)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(act, be defined as same as pretend)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(example, be used to explain something)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(act, be same as pretend)