exercise: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.64
, program
Weight: 0.61
, option
Weight: 0.61
Siblings bicycling
Weight: 0.70
, lesson
Weight: 0.65
, reading
Weight: 0.64
, yoga
Weight: 0.62
, swimming
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
be good for health 0.80
be good for athlets 0.78
contribute to good health 0.76
improve performance 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(exercise, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(yoga, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(exercise, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(swimming, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(exercise, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(yoga, be good for health)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(exercise, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(reading, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(exercise, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(reading, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(reading, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(exercise, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(swimming, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(swimming, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(exercise, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(yoga, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(yoga, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(exercise, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(yoga, be good for health)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(yoga, be good for health)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(exercise, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(exercise, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(exercise, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(exercise, be good for health)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(exercise, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(exercise, be good for health)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(exercise, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(exercise, be good for athlets)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(exercise, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(exercise, improve performance)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(exercise, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(exercise, improve performance)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(exercise, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(exercise, be good for athlets)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(exercise, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(exercise, be good for athlets)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(exercise, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(exercise, be good for health)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(exercise, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(exercise, improve performance)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(exercise, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(exercise, be good for health)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(exercise, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(exercise, be good for athlets)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(exercise, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(exercise, improve performance)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(exercise, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(exercise, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(exercise, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(exercise, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(exercise, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(exercise, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(reading, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(exercise, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(swimming, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(exercise, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(yoga, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(exercise, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(yoga, be good for health)