exit: be to box stores

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents point
Weight: 0.58
, room
Weight: 0.53
, book
Weight: 0.52
, option
Weight: 0.51
Siblings entrance
Weight: 0.60
, entrance hall
Weight: 0.32
, hotel room
Weight: 0.31
, laundry room
Weight: 0.31
, end
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be to box stores 1.00
be to big box stores 0.98
be to box stores opposite 0.94
be to big box stores opposite 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(exit, be to box stores)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(entrance, be to box stores opposite)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(exit, be to box stores)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(entrance, be to big box stores)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(exit, be to box stores)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(entrance, be to box stores)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(exit, be to box stores)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(entrance, be to big box stores opposite)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(exit, be to box stores)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(entrance, be to box stores)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(entrance, be to box stores)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(exit, be to box stores)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(entrance, be to big box stores)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(entrance, be to big box stores)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(exit, be to box stores)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(entrance, be to big box stores opposite)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(entrance, be to big box stores opposite)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(exit, be to box stores)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(entrance, be to box stores opposite)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(entrance, be to box stores opposite)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(exit, be to box stores)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(exit, be to box stores)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(exit, be to box stores)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(exit, be to box stores opposite)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(exit, be to box stores)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(exit, be to box stores opposite)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(exit, be to box stores)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(exit, be to big box stores)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(exit, be to box stores)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(exit, be to big box stores)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(exit, be to box stores)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(exit, be to big box stores opposite)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(exit, be to box stores)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(exit, be to box stores opposite)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(exit, be to box stores)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(exit, be to box stores opposite)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(exit, be to box stores)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(exit, be to big box stores opposite)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(exit, be to box stores)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(exit, be to big box stores)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(exit, be to box stores)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(exit, be to big box stores)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(exit, be to box stores)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(exit, be to big box stores opposite)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(exit, be to box stores)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(exit, be to big box stores opposite)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(exit, be to box stores)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(exit, be to box stores)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(exit, be to box stores)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(exit, be to box stores)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(exit, be to box stores)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(exit, be to box stores)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(entrance, be to box stores)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(exit, be to box stores)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(entrance, be to box stores opposite)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(exit, be to box stores)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(entrance, be to big box stores)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(exit, be to box stores)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(entrance, be to big box stores opposite)