expansion: has quality yoga

Related concepts

Parents	project Weight: 0.69 , construction Weight: 0.64 , factor Weight: 0.59 , growth Weight: 0.59 , issue Weight: 0.58
Siblings	construction site Weight: 0.35 , construction worker Weight: 0.34 , restoration Weight: 0.33 , revision Weight: 0.33 , consolidation Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality yoga	1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Remarkable(expansion, has quality yoga) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Remarkable(restoration, has quality yoga)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(expansion, has quality yoga) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

Remarkable(restoration, has quality yoga) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(restoration, has quality yoga)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(expansion, has quality yoga) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Salient(expansion, has quality yoga)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.25

Salient(expansion, has quality yoga) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(expansion, has quality yoga) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Remarkable(expansion, has quality yoga)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(expansion, has quality yoga) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(expansion, has quality yoga)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Remarkable(expansion, has quality yoga) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(restoration, has quality yoga)