expansion: year

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.69
, construction
Weight: 0.64
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, growth
Weight: 0.59
, issue
Weight: 0.58
Siblings construction site
Weight: 0.35
, construction worker
Weight: 0.34
, restoration
Weight: 0.33
, revision
Weight: 0.33
, consolidation
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
year 1.00
is year 0.99
is week 0.83
die year 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(expansion, year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, die year)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(expansion, year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(consolidation, is week)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(expansion, year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(consolidation, is week) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(consolidation, is week)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(expansion, year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(construction worker, die year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(construction worker, die year)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(expansion, year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(expansion, year)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(expansion, year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(expansion, is year)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(expansion, year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(expansion, is year)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(expansion, year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(expansion, is year)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(expansion, year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(expansion, is year)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(expansion, year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(expansion, year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(expansion, year)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(expansion, year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(expansion, year)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(expansion, year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(construction worker, die year)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(expansion, year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(consolidation, is week)