expectation: be important in models

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents assumption
Weight: 0.66
, benefit
Weight: 0.61
, surprise
Weight: 0.58
, issue
Weight: 0.58
Siblings duty
Weight: 0.63
, uncertainty
Weight: 0.32
, projection
Weight: 0.31
, burden
Weight: 0.31
, increase
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in models 1.00
be in developing models 0.91
be important to model 0.90
be important in macroeconomic models 0.82
be important to structural model 0.79
be important in modeling 0.79
lead to model 0.78
lead to weak model 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(assumption, be important to model) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(expectation, be important in models)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(assumption, be in developing models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(expectation, be important in models)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(assumption, be important to structural model) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(expectation, be important in models)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(assumption, be important in modeling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(expectation, be important in models)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(assumption, lead to model) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(expectation, be important in models)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(assumption, lead to weak model) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(expectation, be important in models)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(expectation, be important in models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(assumption, be in developing models)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(expectation, be important in models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(assumption, be important to model)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(expectation, be important in models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(assumption, be important to structural model)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(expectation, be important in models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(assumption, be important in modeling)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(expectation, be important in models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(assumption, lead to model)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(expectation, be important in models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(assumption, lead to weak model)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(expectation, be important in models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be in developing models)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(expectation, be important in models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be important to model)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(expectation, be important in models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be important to structural model)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(expectation, be important in models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be important in modeling)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(expectation, be important in models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(assumption, lead to weak model)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(expectation, be important in models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(assumption, lead to model)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(assumption, be important to model) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(expectation, be important in models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(expectation, be important in models)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(assumption, be in developing models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(expectation, be important in models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(expectation, be important in models)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(assumption, be important to structural model) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(expectation, be important in models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(expectation, be important in models)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(assumption, be important in modeling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(expectation, be important in models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(expectation, be important in models)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(assumption, lead to model) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(expectation, be important in models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(expectation, be important in models)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(assumption, lead to weak model) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(expectation, be important in models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(expectation, be important in models)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(expectation, be important in models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(expectation, be important in models)

Similarity expansion

0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(expectation, be important in models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(expectation, be important in macroeconomic models)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(expectation, be important in models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(expectation, be important in macroeconomic models)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(expectation, be important in models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(expectation, be important in macroeconomic models)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(expectation, be important in models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(expectation, be important in macroeconomic models)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(expectation, be important in models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(expectation, be important in models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(expectation, be important in models)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(expectation, be important in models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(expectation, be important in models)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(expectation, be important in models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(assumption, be in developing models)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(expectation, be important in models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(assumption, be important to model)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(expectation, be important in models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(assumption, lead to model)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(expectation, be important in models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(assumption, be important to structural model)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(expectation, be important in models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(assumption, be important in modeling)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(expectation, be important in models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(assumption, lead to weak model)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(expectation, be important in models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(assumption, be in developing models)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(expectation, be important in models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(assumption, be important to model)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(expectation, be important in models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(assumption, lead to model)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(expectation, be important in models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(assumption, be important to structural model)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(expectation, be important in models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(assumption, be important in modeling)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(expectation, be important in models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(assumption, lead to weak model)