experience: be important in service

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents attribute
Weight: 0.65
, tool
Weight: 0.65
, asset
Weight: 0.64
, philosophy
Weight: 0.64
Siblings confidence
Weight: 0.63
, chemistry
Weight: 0.63
, attention
Weight: 0.62
, seminar
Weight: 0.62
, achievement
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in service 1.00
be important in business 0.79
be important in life 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(philosophy, be important in life)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(experience, be important in service)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(attribute, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(experience, be important in service)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(experience, be important in service)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(attribute, be important in business)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(experience, be important in service)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(philosophy, be important in life)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(experience, be important in service)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(attribute, be important in business)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(experience, be important in service)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be important in life)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(philosophy, be important in life)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(experience, be important in service)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(experience, be important in service)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(attribute, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(experience, be important in service)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(experience, be important in service)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(experience, be important in service)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(experience, be important in service)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(experience, be important in service)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(experience, be important in business)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(experience, be important in service)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(experience, be important in life)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(experience, be important in service)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(experience, be important in business)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(experience, be important in service)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(experience, be important in business)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(experience, be important in service)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(experience, be important in business)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(experience, be important in service)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(experience, be important in life)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(experience, be important in service)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(experience, be important in life)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(experience, be important in service)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(experience, be important in life)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(experience, be important in service)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(experience, be important in service)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(experience, be important in service)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(experience, be important in service)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(experience, be important in service)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(experience, be important in service)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(attribute, be important in business)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(experience, be important in service)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(philosophy, be important in life)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(experience, be important in service)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(attribute, be important in business)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(experience, be important in service)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(philosophy, be important in life)