experience: be in role

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents attribute
Weight: 0.65
, tool
Weight: 0.65
, asset
Weight: 0.64
, philosophy
Weight: 0.64
Siblings confidence
Weight: 0.63
, chemistry
Weight: 0.63
, attention
Weight: 0.62
, seminar
Weight: 0.62
, achievement
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in role 1.00
be in role important 0.97
be in similar role 0.93
be in similar role important 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(experience, be in role) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(experience, be in role)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(experience, be in role) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(experience, be in similar role)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(experience, be in role) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(experience, be in role important)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(experience, be in role) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(experience, be in similar role)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(experience, be in role) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(experience, be in similar role important)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(experience, be in role) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(experience, be in similar role)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(experience, be in role) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(experience, be in similar role)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(experience, be in role) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(experience, be in similar role important)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(experience, be in role) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(experience, be in similar role important)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(experience, be in role) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(experience, be in role important)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(experience, be in role) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(experience, be in role important)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(experience, be in role) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(experience, be in similar role important)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(experience, be in role) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(experience, be in role important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(experience, be in role) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(experience, be in role) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(experience, be in role)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(experience, be in role) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(experience, be in role)