experiment: be better than observational studies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents observation
Weight: 0.65
, thing
Weight: 0.61
, concept
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.57
, process
Weight: 0.57
Siblings lux
Weight: 0.46
, string theory
Weight: 0.32
, living thing
Weight: 0.32
, approach
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than observational studies 1.00
be better than correlational studies 0.89
be important to scientific study 0.83
be important to study 0.79
be useful to social research 0.76
be important in research 0.76
is scientific 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(experiment, be better than observational studies)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(experiment, be better than observational studies)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(experiment, be better than observational studies)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(experiment, be better than correlational studies)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(experiment, be better than observational studies)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(experiment, be better than correlational studies)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(experiment, be better than observational studies)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(experiment, be important to scientific study)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(experiment, be better than observational studies)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(experiment, be important to scientific study)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(experiment, be better than observational studies)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(experiment, be better than correlational studies)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(experiment, be better than observational studies)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(experiment, be better than correlational studies)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(experiment, be better than observational studies)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(experiment, be useful to social research)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(experiment, be better than observational studies)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(experiment, is scientific)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(experiment, be better than observational studies)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(experiment, be important in research)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(experiment, be better than observational studies)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(experiment, be important in research)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(experiment, be better than observational studies)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(experiment, be important to scientific study)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(experiment, be better than observational studies)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(experiment, be useful to social research)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(experiment, be better than observational studies)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(experiment, be useful to social research)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(experiment, be better than observational studies)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(experiment, is scientific)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(experiment, be better than observational studies)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(experiment, is scientific)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(experiment, be better than observational studies)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(experiment, be useful to social research)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(experiment, be better than observational studies)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(experiment, is scientific)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(experiment, be better than observational studies)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(experiment, be important in research)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(experiment, be better than observational studies)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(experiment, be important to scientific study)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(experiment, be better than observational studies)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(experiment, be important in research)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(experiment, be better than observational studies)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(experiment, be better than observational studies)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(experiment, be better than observational studies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(experiment, be better than observational studies)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(experiment, be better than observational studies)