expert: note fine detail

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents psychologist
Weight: 0.71
, technology
Weight: 0.59
, physician
Weight: 0.57
, authority
Weight: 0.56
Siblings analyst
Weight: 0.76
, author
Weight: 0.74
, scholar
Weight: 0.73
, lawyer
Weight: 0.69
, scientist
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
note fine detail 1.00
note number 0.77
fine company 0.76
note difference 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(expert, note fine detail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(scientist, note number)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(expert, note fine detail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(scientist, note difference)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(expert, note fine detail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, fine company)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(expert, note fine detail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(lawyer, fine company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(lawyer, fine company)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(expert, note fine detail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(scientist, note difference) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(scientist, note difference)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(expert, note fine detail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(scientist, note number) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(scientist, note number)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(expert, note fine detail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(expert, note fine detail)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(expert, note fine detail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(expert, note fine detail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(expert, note fine detail)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(expert, note fine detail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(expert, note fine detail)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(expert, note fine detail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(scientist, note number)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(expert, note fine detail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(scientist, note difference)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(expert, note fine detail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(lawyer, fine company)