explosion: work on level

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents accident
Weight: 0.74
, hazard
Weight: 0.64
, loud noise
Weight: 0.63
, event
Weight: 0.61
Siblings blast
Weight: 0.65
, fire
Weight: 0.62
, grenade
Weight: 0.54
, gunfire
Weight: 0.51
, plane crash
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
work on level 1.00
work 0.79
work on molecular level 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(explosion, work on level)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(grenade, work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(explosion, work on level)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(grenade, work)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(grenade, work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(explosion, work on level)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(explosion, work on level)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(explosion, work on level)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(explosion, work on molecular level)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(explosion, work on level)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(explosion, work on molecular level)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(explosion, work on level)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(explosion, work)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(explosion, work on level)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(explosion, work)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(explosion, work on level)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(explosion, work)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(explosion, work on level)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(explosion, work on molecular level)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(explosion, work on level)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(explosion, work)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(explosion, work on level)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(explosion, work on molecular level)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(explosion, work on level)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(explosion, work on level)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(explosion, work on level)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(explosion, work on level)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(explosion, work on level)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(explosion, work on level)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(grenade, work)