explosive: be at construction site

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents substance
Weight: 0.63
, material
Weight: 0.58
, weapon
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.56
Siblings pipe bomb
Weight: 0.71
, dynamite
Weight: 0.69
, gunpowder
Weight: 0.66
, nitroglycerin
Weight: 0.56
, detonator
Weight: 0.48

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at construction site 1.00
be at construction 0.92
be used to construction 0.91
be use in construction project 0.89
be at construction hut 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.11
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(material, be at construction)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(explosive, be at construction site)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(explosive, be at construction site)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(material, be at construction)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(explosive, be at construction site)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(material, be at construction)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(explosive, be at construction site)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(dynamite, be at construction site)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(material, be at construction)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(explosive, be at construction site)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(explosive, be at construction site)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(explosive, be at construction site)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(dynamite, be at construction site)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(dynamite, be at construction site)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(explosive, be at construction site)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(explosive, be at construction site)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(explosive, be at construction site)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(explosive, be use in construction project)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(explosive, be at construction site)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(explosive, be used to construction)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(explosive, be at construction site)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(explosive, be used to construction)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(explosive, be at construction site)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(explosive, be used to construction)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(explosive, be at construction site)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(explosive, be used to construction)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(explosive, be at construction site)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(explosive, be use in construction project)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(explosive, be at construction site)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(explosive, be at construction hut)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(explosive, be at construction site)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(explosive, be at construction hut)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(explosive, be at construction site)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(explosive, be at construction hut)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(explosive, be at construction site)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(explosive, be at construction hut)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(explosive, be at construction site)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(explosive, be use in construction project)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(explosive, be at construction site)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(explosive, be use in construction project)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(explosive, be at construction site)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(explosive, be at construction site)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(explosive, be at construction site)

Typical implies Plausible

0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(explosive, be at construction site)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(explosive, be at construction site)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(explosive, be at construction site)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(material, be at construction)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(explosive, be at construction site)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(dynamite, be at construction site)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(explosive, be at construction site)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(material, be at construction)