extinction: be important part of macroevolution

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents catastrophe
Weight: 0.53
, concept
Weight: 0.52
, process
Weight: 0.51
, problem
Weight: 0.49
, topic
Weight: 0.49
Siblings overpopulation
Weight: 0.31
, starvation
Weight: 0.31
, evolution
Weight: 0.31
, global warming
Weight: 0.31
, speciation
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important part of macroevolution 1.00
be important part of evolution 0.83
be important to evolution 0.83
be necessary for evolution 0.82
be necessary aspect of evolution 0.81
be important to success of evolution 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(extinction, be important part of macroevolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(extinction, be important part of macroevolution)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(extinction, be important part of macroevolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(extinction, be necessary for evolution)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(extinction, be important part of macroevolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(extinction, be necessary for evolution)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(extinction, be important part of macroevolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(extinction, be necessary aspect of evolution)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(extinction, be important part of macroevolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(extinction, be necessary for evolution)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(extinction, be important part of macroevolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(extinction, be important to success of evolution)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(extinction, be important part of macroevolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(extinction, be important to success of evolution)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(extinction, be important part of macroevolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(extinction, be important to success of evolution)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(extinction, be important part of macroevolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(extinction, be important to evolution)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(extinction, be important part of macroevolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(extinction, be important to evolution)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(extinction, be important part of macroevolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(extinction, be important to evolution)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(extinction, be important part of macroevolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(extinction, be important to evolution)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(extinction, be important part of macroevolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(extinction, be necessary aspect of evolution)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(extinction, be important part of macroevolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(extinction, be necessary for evolution)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(extinction, be important part of macroevolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(extinction, be important to success of evolution)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(extinction, be important part of macroevolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(extinction, be important part of evolution)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(extinction, be important part of macroevolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(extinction, be important part of evolution)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(extinction, be important part of macroevolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(extinction, be important part of evolution)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(extinction, be important part of macroevolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(extinction, be important part of evolution)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(extinction, be important part of macroevolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(extinction, be necessary aspect of evolution)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(extinction, be important part of macroevolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(extinction, be necessary aspect of evolution)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(extinction, be important part of macroevolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(extinction, be important part of macroevolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(extinction, be important part of macroevolution)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(extinction, be important part of macroevolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(extinction, be important part of macroevolution)