extraction: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.67
, operation
Weight: 0.66
, process
Weight: 0.66
, industry
Weight: 0.61
, surgical procedure
Weight: 0.60
Siblings fermentation
Weight: 0.34
, harvesting
Weight: 0.34
, distillation
Weight: 0.34
, combustion
Weight: 0.34
, diffusion
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
is more efficient 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(extraction, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(distillation, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(extraction, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(distillation, is more efficient)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(extraction, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(distillation, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(distillation, is expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(extraction, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(distillation, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(distillation, is more efficient)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(extraction, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(extraction, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(extraction, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(extraction, is more efficient)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(extraction, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(extraction, is more efficient)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(extraction, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(extraction, is more efficient)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(extraction, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(extraction, is more efficient)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(extraction, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(extraction, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(extraction, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(extraction, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(extraction, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(extraction, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(distillation, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(extraction, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(distillation, is more efficient)