eye contact: be important in nonverbal communication

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents aspect
Weight: 0.64
, behavior
Weight: 0.63
, element
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.61
Siblings human eye
Weight: 0.35
, touch
Weight: 0.34
, eyeball
Weight: 0.33
, focus
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in nonverbal communication 1.00
be important in communication 0.84
be important for communication 0.83
be important factor in communication 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(eye contact, be important in nonverbal communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(touch, be important in communication)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(eye contact, be important in nonverbal communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(touch, be important in communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(touch, be important in communication)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(eye contact, be important in nonverbal communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(eye contact, be important in nonverbal communication)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(eye contact, be important in nonverbal communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(eye contact, be important in communication)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(eye contact, be important in nonverbal communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(eye contact, be important for communication)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(eye contact, be important in nonverbal communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(eye contact, be important in communication)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(eye contact, be important in nonverbal communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(eye contact, be important for communication)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(eye contact, be important in nonverbal communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(eye contact, be important for communication)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(eye contact, be important in nonverbal communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(eye contact, be important in communication)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(eye contact, be important in nonverbal communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(eye contact, be important factor in communication)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(eye contact, be important in nonverbal communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(eye contact, be important in communication)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(eye contact, be important in nonverbal communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(eye contact, be important for communication)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(eye contact, be important in nonverbal communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(eye contact, be important factor in communication)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(eye contact, be important in nonverbal communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(eye contact, be important factor in communication)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(eye contact, be important in nonverbal communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(eye contact, be important factor in communication)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(eye contact, be important in nonverbal communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(eye contact, be important in nonverbal communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(eye contact, be important in nonverbal communication)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(eye contact, be important in nonverbal communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(eye contact, be important in nonverbal communication)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(eye contact, be important in nonverbal communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(touch, be important in communication)