eye contact: be important in relationship

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents aspect
Weight: 0.64
, behavior
Weight: 0.63
, element
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.61
Siblings human eye
Weight: 0.35
, touch
Weight: 0.34
, eyeball
Weight: 0.33
, focus
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in relationship 1.00
be crucial in business conversations 0.77
is very important 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(eye contact, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(touch, be important in relationship)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(eye contact, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(touch, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(touch, be important in relationship)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(eye contact, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(eye contact, be important in relationship)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(eye contact, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(eye contact, be crucial in business conversations)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(eye contact, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(eye contact, be crucial in business conversations)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(eye contact, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(eye contact, be crucial in business conversations)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(eye contact, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(eye contact, be crucial in business conversations)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(eye contact, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(eye contact, is very important)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(eye contact, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(eye contact, is very important)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(eye contact, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(eye contact, is very important)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(eye contact, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(eye contact, is very important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(eye contact, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(eye contact, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(eye contact, be important in relationship)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(eye contact, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(eye contact, be important in relationship)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(eye contact, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(touch, be important in relationship)