factor: be related to area

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents determinant
Weight: 0.79
, influence
Weight: 0.72
, element
Weight: 0.70
, parameter
Weight: 0.64
Siblings characteristic
Weight: 0.73
, key
Weight: 0.72
, attribute
Weight: 0.70
, consequence
Weight: 0.69
, matter
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to area 1.00
be related 0.85
be related to number 0.79
be related to prime number 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(influence, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(factor, be related to area)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(factor, be related to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(influence, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(influence, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(matter, be related)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(characteristic, be related)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(influence, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(factor, be related to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(factor, be related to area)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(factor, be related to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(characteristic, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(characteristic, be related)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(factor, be related to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(matter, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(matter, be related)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(factor, be related to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(factor, be related to area)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(factor, be related to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(factor, be related to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related to number)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(factor, be related to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related to prime number)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(factor, be related to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(factor, be related to number)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(factor, be related to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(factor, be related to number)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(factor, be related to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(factor, be related to number)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(factor, be related to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(factor, be related)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(factor, be related to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(factor, be related)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(factor, be related to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(factor, be related to prime number)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(factor, be related to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factor, be related)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(factor, be related to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(factor, be related to prime number)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(factor, be related to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(factor, be related to prime number)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(factor, be related to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(factor, be related to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related to area)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(factor, be related to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(factor, be related to area)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(influence, be related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(characteristic, be related)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(matter, be related)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(factor, be related to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(influence, be related)