factor: be related use examples

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents determinant
Weight: 0.79
, influence
Weight: 0.72
, element
Weight: 0.70
, parameter
Weight: 0.64
Siblings characteristic
Weight: 0.73
, key
Weight: 0.72
, attribute
Weight: 0.70
, consequence
Weight: 0.69
, matter
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related use examples 1.00
be use examples 0.96
be related 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(influence, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(factor, be related use examples)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(factor, be related use examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(influence, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related use examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(influence, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related use examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(matter, be related)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related use examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(characteristic, be related)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(influence, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(factor, be related use examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(factor, be related use examples)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(factor, be related use examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(characteristic, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(characteristic, be related)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(factor, be related use examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(matter, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(matter, be related)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(factor, be related use examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(factor, be related use examples)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(factor, be related use examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(factor, be use examples)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(factor, be related use examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(factor, be use examples)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(factor, be related use examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(factor, be use examples)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(factor, be related use examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(factor, be use examples)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(factor, be related use examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(factor, be related use examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(factor, be related)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(factor, be related use examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(factor, be related)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(factor, be related use examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factor, be related)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(factor, be related use examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(factor, be related use examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related use examples)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(factor, be related use examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(factor, be related use examples)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related use examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(influence, be related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related use examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(characteristic, be related)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related use examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(matter, be related)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(factor, be related use examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(influence, be related)