factorization: be helpful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.49
, thing
Weight: 0.38
Siblings trigonometric function
Weight: 0.31
, recursion
Weight: 0.31
, boolean algebra
Weight: 0.31
, polynomial
Weight: 0.31
, metric space
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be helpful 1.00
is useful 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(factorization, be helpful)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(polynomial, is useful)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(factorization, be helpful)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(recursion, is useful)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(factorization, be helpful)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(trigonometric function, is useful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(factorization, be helpful)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(trigonometric function, is useful)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(trigonometric function, is useful)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(factorization, be helpful)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(recursion, is useful)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(recursion, is useful)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(factorization, be helpful)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(polynomial, is useful)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(polynomial, is useful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(factorization, be helpful)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(factorization, be helpful)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(factorization, be helpful)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(factorization, is useful)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(factorization, be helpful)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(factorization, is useful)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(factorization, be helpful)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(factorization, is useful)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(factorization, be helpful)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(factorization, is useful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(factorization, be helpful)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(factorization, be helpful)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(factorization, be helpful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(factorization, be helpful)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(factorization, be helpful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(factorization, be helpful)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(trigonometric function, is useful)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(factorization, be helpful)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(recursion, is useful)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(factorization, be helpful)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(polynomial, is useful)