failing: result in charge

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.48
, statement
Weight: 0.45
, state
Weight: 0.43
, form
Weight: 0.38
, tendency
Weight: 0.37
Siblings fail
Weight: 0.29
, try
Weight: 0.29
, reluctance
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
result in charge 1.00
result in criminal charge 0.90
result in charge of negligence 0.83
result in criminal charge of negligence 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(failing, result in charge)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(failing, result in charge)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(failing, result in charge)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(failing, result in criminal charge)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(failing, result in charge)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(failing, result in criminal charge)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(failing, result in charge)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(failing, result in criminal charge)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(failing, result in charge)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(failing, result in criminal charge of negligence)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(failing, result in charge)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(failing, result in criminal charge)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(failing, result in charge)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(failing, result in charge of negligence)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(failing, result in charge)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(failing, result in charge of negligence)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(failing, result in charge)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(failing, result in charge of negligence)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(failing, result in charge)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(failing, result in charge of negligence)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(failing, result in charge)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(failing, result in criminal charge of negligence)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(failing, result in charge)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(failing, result in criminal charge of negligence)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(failing, result in charge)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(failing, result in criminal charge of negligence)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(failing, result in charge)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(failing, result in charge)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(failing, result in charge)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(failing, result in charge)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(failing, result in charge)