failure: has state success

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mistake
Weight: 0.67
, breach
Weight: 0.65
, disappointment
Weight: 0.61
, obstacle
Weight: 0.61
Siblings heart failure
Weight: 0.77
, omission
Weight: 0.66
, negligence
Weight: 0.61
, communication
Weight: 0.61
, flat tire
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state success 1.00
be part of success 0.93
be important to success 0.92
be key to success 0.89
be vital to success 0.87
lead to success 0.86
be vital to success of business 0.86
be valuable part of success 0.86
be path to success 0.84
step stone to success 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(obstacle, lead to success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(failure, has state success)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(failure, has state success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(obstacle, lead to success)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(failure, has state success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(obstacle, lead to success)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(obstacle, lead to success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(failure, has state success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(failure, has state success)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(failure, has state success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(failure, has state success)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(failure, has state success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(failure, be part of success)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(failure, has state success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(failure, be part of success)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(failure, has state success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(failure, be part of success)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(failure, has state success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(failure, be important to success)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(failure, has state success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(failure, be important to success)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(failure, has state success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(failure, be important to success)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(failure, has state success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(failure, be key to success)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(failure, has state success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(failure, be key to success)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(failure, has state success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(failure, be key to success)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(failure, has state success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(failure, be valuable part of success)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(failure, has state success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(failure, be valuable part of success)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(failure, has state success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(failure, be valuable part of success)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(failure, has state success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(failure, be path to success)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(failure, has state success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(failure, be path to success)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(failure, has state success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(failure, be path to success)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(failure, has state success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(failure, be part of success)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(failure, has state success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(failure, be key to success)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(failure, has state success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(failure, step stone to success)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(failure, has state success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(failure, step stone to success)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(failure, has state success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(failure, step stone to success)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(failure, has state success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(failure, be important to success)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(failure, has state success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(failure, be path to success)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(failure, has state success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(failure, be valuable part of success)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(failure, has state success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(failure, step stone to success)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(failure, has state success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(failure, has state success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(failure, has state success)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(failure, has state success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(failure, has state success)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(failure, has state success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(obstacle, lead to success)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(failure, has state success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(obstacle, lead to success)