fall: be out boy splitting

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents rise
Weight: 0.63
, blow
Weight: 0.61
, hit
Weight: 0.61
, mistake
Weight: 0.60
Siblings falling
Weight: 0.34
, slide
Weight: 0.34
, jump
Weight: 0.33
, creep
Weight: 0.32
, down
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be out boy splitting 1.00
be out boy 0.85
be out boy called 0.84
was out boy 0.84
be out boy popular 0.83
be out boy hated 0.82
be famous out boy 0.81
was out boy discovered 0.80
be out boy awesome 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fall, be out boy splitting)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(fall, be out boy splitting)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(fall, be out boy splitting)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(fall, be out boy hated)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(fall, be out boy splitting)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(fall, be out boy hated)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fall, be out boy splitting)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(fall, be out boy hated)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(fall, be out boy splitting)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(fall, be out boy hated)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(fall, be out boy splitting)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(fall, be out boy called)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(fall, be out boy splitting)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(fall, be out boy)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(fall, be out boy splitting)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(fall, be out boy)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fall, be out boy splitting)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(fall, be out boy)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fall, be out boy splitting)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(fall, be out boy called)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(fall, be out boy splitting)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(fall, be out boy called)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(fall, be out boy splitting)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(fall, be out boy called)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(fall, be out boy splitting)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(fall, be out boy awesome)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(fall, be out boy splitting)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(fall, be famous out boy)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(fall, be out boy splitting)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(fall, be famous out boy)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(fall, be out boy splitting)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(fall, was out boy discovered)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(fall, be out boy splitting)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fall, be out boy awesome)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(fall, be out boy splitting)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(fall, was out boy discovered)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(fall, be out boy splitting)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(fall, be out boy)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fall, be out boy splitting)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(fall, be out boy awesome)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fall, be out boy splitting)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(fall, was out boy discovered)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(fall, be out boy splitting)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(fall, be famous out boy)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fall, be out boy splitting)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(fall, be famous out boy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(fall, be out boy splitting)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(fall, be out boy awesome)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(fall, be out boy splitting)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(fall, was out boy discovered)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(fall, be out boy splitting)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(fall, be out boy splitting)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(fall, be out boy splitting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fall, be out boy splitting)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(fall, be out boy splitting)