fall: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents rise
Weight: 0.63
, blow
Weight: 0.61
, hit
Weight: 0.61
, mistake
Weight: 0.60
Siblings falling
Weight: 0.34
, slide
Weight: 0.34
, jump
Weight: 0.33
, creep
Weight: 0.32
, down
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is quality 0.91
is low quality 0.84
is great 0.81
feel good 0.80
be good time buy 0.77
be called great 0.77
is good season 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(rise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fall, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(rise, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fall, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(hit, is low quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fall, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(blow, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fall, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(hit, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fall, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(mistake, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fall, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(mistake, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fall, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(mistake, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(mistake, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(blow, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(rise, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(hit, is quality)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(rise, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(hit, is low quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(mistake, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(blow, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(mistake, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(rise, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(rise, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(hit, is low quality)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(hit, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(creep, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(falling, feel good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(jump, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(rise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(fall, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(blow, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(fall, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(rise, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(fall, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(hit, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(fall, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(hit, is low quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(fall, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(mistake, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(fall, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(mistake, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(fall, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(jump, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(jump, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(creep, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(creep, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(falling, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(falling, feel good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(fall, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(fall, be called great)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(fall, be called great)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(fall, is great)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(fall, be called great)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(fall, be good time buy)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(fall, is great)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(fall, be called great)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(fall, is good season)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(fall, is good season)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(fall, is great)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(fall, is good season)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(fall, is great)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(fall, is good season)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(fall, be good time buy)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(fall, be good time buy)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fall, be good time buy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(fall, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fall, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(mistake, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(mistake, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(hit, is quality)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(blow, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(rise, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(rise, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(hit, is low quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(falling, feel good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(jump, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(creep, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(mistake, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(mistake, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(blow, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(hit, is quality)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(rise, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(rise, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(fall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(hit, is low quality)