fan: be related to chemistry

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents accessory
Weight: 0.60
, aspect
Weight: 0.60
, item
Weight: 0.59
, critic
Weight: 0.59
Siblings writer
Weight: 0.66
, sports fan
Weight: 0.65
, customer
Weight: 0.64
, paul mccartney
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to chemistry 1.00
be related to physics 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fan, be related to chemistry)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(fan, be related to chemistry)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(fan, be related to chemistry)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(fan, be related to physics)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fan, be related to chemistry)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(fan, be related to physics)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(fan, be related to chemistry)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(fan, be related to physics)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(fan, be related to chemistry)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fan, be related to physics)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(fan, be related to chemistry)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(fan, be related to chemistry)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(fan, be related to chemistry)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fan, be related to chemistry)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(fan, be related to chemistry)